stopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 1 year agoMusk says Twitter will no longer have a light mode, making dark mode the default option9to5mac.comexternal-linkmessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up148arrow-down1external-linkMusk says Twitter will no longer have a light mode, making dark mode the default option9to5mac.comstopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square96fedilinkfile-text
Since Elon Musk became Twitter’s CEO, he’s been pushing through a lot of changes to the social network. But perhaps…
minus-squarestopthatgirl7OPlinkfedilink3•1 year agoWhy did you cherry pick the one thing you can dismiss and ignore that they’ve been causing actual environmental damage?
minus-squareTheSaneWriterAlink2•1 year agoThey did the same thing in my comment thread. Ignored my source, cherry-picked a single argument they had a rebuttal for, and dismissed any culpability SpaceX could have had.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoAre you the person that blamed musk for the government choosing him over building a high speed rail? If not, what are you talking about?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoWhen that’s one of the first and main points brought up in the article and it’s so stupid it basically screams “this article is garbage”. You’re talking about environmental damage limited to some tiny little area around the launch site. If that’s the best you’ve got, give up.
minus-squarestopthatgirl7OPlinkfedilink1•1 year agoSome people are definitely worth talking to and discussing opposing viewpoints. You do not seem to be one of those people. Have a lovely day.
Why did you cherry pick the one thing you can dismiss and ignore that they’ve been causing actual environmental damage?
They did the same thing in my comment thread. Ignored my source, cherry-picked a single argument they had a rebuttal for, and dismissed any culpability SpaceX could have had.
Are you the person that blamed musk for the government choosing him over building a high speed rail?
If not, what are you talking about?
When that’s one of the first and main points brought up in the article and it’s so stupid it basically screams “this article is garbage”.
You’re talking about environmental damage limited to some tiny little area around the launch site. If that’s the best you’ve got, give up.
Some people are definitely worth talking to and discussing opposing viewpoints.
You do not seem to be one of those people. Have a lovely day.