• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    “Again, it required no batteries — much desired by Zenith, as the company didn’t want customers to think a TV was broken when the battery died.”

    Was this really that big of a concern? Did people really think that LMAO

    • a new sad me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      In a world where remotes are scarce, I could see how this would be a concern, yes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Where remotes are scarce? What do you mean by that, are you talking about the time when they came in or now

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          They were talking about the device from the article, when a non-wired remote was a new and neat idea. Also, standardized, long-lasting batteries may not have been as common as we’re used to these days.

          That’s the world where the original engineers decided not to go with an electronic device, so they didn’t have customers buying the bleeding edge tech and thinking it had bricked a couple of months after purchase because “did you change the battery?” wasn’t a consideration they were used to yet

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      If you’re planning on selling 1 million units, a half of a percent of people making that mistake means a big headache.