• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Boomers say that because historically, with increasing age people usually also managed to have some things they might want to conserve, like a home and some financial assets to cover their retirement. I’m in my mid thirties and the only feasible way for me to ever own a home is inheriting one. My retirement plan is to die in the revolution. I have nothing to be conservative about

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Yeah, I have zero desire to conserve a system that is actively destroying my future. I’m fortunate that I work in an in-demand field, but even as a member of the professional class earning a professional salary, the cost of housing is insane, and the climate crisis is going to deeply impact the state of the world I live in for the rest of my life.

      The main thing I’m out here trying to conserve is the environment before we go past the point of no return, which in all honesty we might have already passed.

      • TheSaneWriterA
        link
        81 year ago

        We’ve passed the point of no return for many things, but not everything. We could still improve this world’s standards if we started taking climate change seriously, but unfortunately our system is designed to react as the last moment instead of being proactive about literally anything.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Im 100% here. By being massively successful I can afford a working class quality of life from yesteryear and mostly just try to enjoy as much local nature as I can while I still can.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      even if you do inherit one you will lose it quickly if you get some medical thing that keeps you from working while concurrently giving you large bills.