Otherwise, if we have a lot of medium sized instances but the most popular communities are hosted on just a few huge instances, doesn’t that defeat the purpose of distributing load across many instances?
If that’s the case, how do we solve the cumbersome user experience of having to subscribe to the same community over and over again across a ton of medium instances?
Duplicate communities are good. Reddit’s biggest problem was that a group of mods would take over a topic and prevent all opinions different from their own. Here you can just jump to an alternative community.
I mostly agree, but look at the Technology community. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. They are all about the same thing and subscribing them all gets a lot of dupes.
Then, don’t? Just subscribe to one of them.
It’s not all duplicates.
Obviously. But that’s not an issue, just find one community you like, ignore the others.
Just read all the other comments in this post asking for a technical way to merge similar communities. I’m just asking for the same thing.
While the name may be the same, different articles get posted to each… just that often the same article gets posted to all.
Furthermore, discussions within each /c/ involve a different set of people.
Yes, of course. But you don’t need to be part of every discussion to a subject. Just subscribe to one tech community you like (or as many as you want) and ignore the others.
That would really depend on the community and I would argue that it is easier to take up your concerns with the admin of the instance, if a community is being mismanaged, than it would be on Reddit.
I had r/europe and r/worldnews in mind. Both communities had been hijacked by mods who turned them into echo chambers.
I’m unfamiliar with /r/Europe, but /r/worldnews did have some decent alternatives, such as /r/neutralnews. But most people seemed to flock to /r/worldnews, probably because of the name.
So lemmy having multiple communities with the same name could help with that, but there’s still the natural human tendancy to go to the more popular community. I know I prefer to go to the larger one much of the time, unless there are multiple sufficiently large options, in which case I’ll generally go with the smaller one first.
I wonder if this level of abstraction will mean a long-term sustainment of the golden days that past social platforms have had in early adopter periods. Specifically I mean platforms that predate Reddit, eg. Twitter, Digg, StumbleUpon, even FB in the pre-genpop days. Prior to that is before my time of early adoption (MySpace, LiveJournal, Friendster), so I have less historical context.