• Rob T Firefly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Screenshots are no more unalterable or trustworthy than text. Why not copy/pasted text and a link?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      On Twitter Rob T Firefly said “mob is right about screenshots”

      Just doesn’t have to same vibe

      • Rob T Firefly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        No, but everyone can access and read that in their own choice of viewing tech without problem, even on very large or very small monitors, even through automatic translation apps, even in an audio screen reader or a braille interface.

        An important part of the fuel of the exodus from Reddit to here was Reddit deliberately shitting on users who happen to have special accessibility needs. Lemmy - the software and the user community - needs to be better than that to earn its place as rightful successor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But just because Reddit did it, doesn’t mean it was wrong.

          Screenshots provided context, a compatible format, more difficulty to edit(not hard, but way more difficult than swapping words around in a copy/paste).

          Also if you linked a presidential tweet, Instagram post, or other social media… There is a large percent of people who will not be able to access it due to not having an account.

          I understand wanting a link to the source, but I can’t think of any realistic reason a copy/paste would actually be better than a screenshot other than assistance software. Which is important, but I don’t think it alone outweighs screenshot benefits

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            It’s not a compatible format with screen readers. I’d say use a site like the Internet Archive maybe? ~Cherri