- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
In 2003, the World Wide Web was still in its infancy. Dial-up connections were still the default and YouTube, Facebook, and Gmail had yet to be invented.
I’d argue it had reached its prime. Websites were just websites then, not data harvesting machines.
Maybe the content reached its peak, but I’d argue we are in a better place now UX-wise.
Full disclosure: I type this from a network running pihole. Flashing banner ads to other people’s blogs were definitely better than todays adverts — and I’m looking at you, most recipe sites.
Nononono, UX is fucking terrible at the moment, if you said this somewhere like 10-15 years ago I would probably agree with you, but everything is designed to serve ads and be as functionless as possible these days.
You’re just visiting shit sites. It’s on you.
2003 was also littered with browser toolbars, animated gif ads, scam links, popups, adware, viruses and worms, and purple apes. gotta go back another 10 years to get to the ‘websites were just websites’ era.
Oh, so the stuff that is built into the browser and social media apps now instead of requiring you to use an add on bar.
You forget how long sites took to load over 33.6k, and how limited your options were for email before Gmail became popular. Free email plans were measured in megabytes, and you could only send like 200k worth of attachments per message.
The bottleneck was your internet speed back then, now it’s your CPU.
Yea, infancy? Been using it for at least 6 years by then, it’s hardly infancy.
Were dial-up connections default still? I had been on cable for two years by then.
deleted by creator
A Matrix fan film, Fanimatrix.
With a limited budget of just $800, nearly half of which was spent on a leather jacket
Lol
I was so sure it was some ancient linux distro, still seeded by some university for what ever reason, but no.
