alt text

three rows with a barbecue on the left and William Wallace in Braveheart on the right.

In the first row, captioned Wednesday, the barbecue is labelled “$899.99” and Wallace says “hold”.

The second row, captioned Thursday, depicts the same.

In the third row, captioned Black Friday, the there is a label with $1099.99 struck through with “$899.99” written underneath, and Wallace charges.

edit: grammar

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      That’s why I live in the EU, and they have to include the lowest price in the last 30 days with the “discount” price.

          • baltakatei
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            Wouldn’t a loophole be to relist something to include some extra trinket with the main product (e.g. lens cleaner with a camera) and argue the “new” listing is something completely different than before?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              510 months ago

              Or raise the price 31 days prior, and “drastically discount” it after. It seems like a cool policy in theory, but it also sounds like it doesn’t really have any teeth. Like a “political theater” kind of law. But who’s to say, maybe it could be someone’s poli-sci thesis some day.

              Or I’m just dumb and don’t understand something fundamental about it; I also except that

              • TheSaneWriterA
                link
                English
                210 months ago

                It seems like a difficult thing to regulate. I hope that this can be a starting point that will be potentially expanded later as needed, but we’ll see.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        So if you raise the price 31 days prior, and then put the discount on, you should still be good to squeeze more profit!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Maybe the 30 day decrease in profit would be worth the additional units sold later (possibly at a slightly elevated price), due to the marketing of a perceived “deal”.

            I guess there’s a lot of variables that could come into play (type of product, inventory, how many units need to sell over a time period to break even, etc), but it doesn’t seem implausible, so much as it does dependent. But idk, I still can’t figure out how the fuck magnets work, let alone accounting

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      The extensions are nice.

      The annoying part is the 10 things on my save list haven’t budged in price for over 1.5 years. 😭😭😭

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Oh… Im so sorry to hear that. Second thing I do is check the second hand stores near me. I have one that validates their products and offers a 1 year warranty on the second hand stuff I buy from them, and it’s kind of awesome. They even rate the quality.