alt text

three rows with a barbecue on the left and William Wallace in Braveheart on the right.

In the first row, captioned Wednesday, the barbecue is labelled “$899.99” and Wallace says “hold”.

The second row, captioned Thursday, depicts the same.

In the third row, captioned Black Friday, the there is a label with $1099.99 struck through with “$899.99” written underneath, and Wallace charges.

edit: grammar

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2310 months ago

    That’s why I live in the EU, and they have to include the lowest price in the last 30 days with the “discount” price.

        • baltakatei
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          Wouldn’t a loophole be to relist something to include some extra trinket with the main product (e.g. lens cleaner with a camera) and argue the “new” listing is something completely different than before?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            Or raise the price 31 days prior, and “drastically discount” it after. It seems like a cool policy in theory, but it also sounds like it doesn’t really have any teeth. Like a “political theater” kind of law. But who’s to say, maybe it could be someone’s poli-sci thesis some day.

            Or I’m just dumb and don’t understand something fundamental about it; I also except that

            • TheSaneWriterA
              link
              English
              210 months ago

              It seems like a difficult thing to regulate. I hope that this can be a starting point that will be potentially expanded later as needed, but we’ll see.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      So if you raise the price 31 days prior, and then put the discount on, you should still be good to squeeze more profit!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Maybe the 30 day decrease in profit would be worth the additional units sold later (possibly at a slightly elevated price), due to the marketing of a perceived “deal”.

          I guess there’s a lot of variables that could come into play (type of product, inventory, how many units need to sell over a time period to break even, etc), but it doesn’t seem implausible, so much as it does dependent. But idk, I still can’t figure out how the fuck magnets work, let alone accounting